Doc, about 7 min to read

FINAL Rebunk for Dice Control

Also listed as: Final Rebunk for Dice control feat · FINAL Rebunk for Yumeko Dice Control

This entry was filled in automatically; the author may be wrong. Suggest a correction.

File

Google DocSaved

5 pages1,524 wordsSaved 2026-11-15

Open the original Google Doc

Text preview
FINAL Rebunk for Yumeko Dice Control This is a response to the self proclaimed ‘Ultimate’ debunk made after quite a lot of debunks and rebunks were thrown around for the Dice Control Feat for Yumeko. For some additional context, me and Cris-mix had quite a long discussion under the Reddit post with the original debunk. I told him that I didn’t want a doc war, as it was inefficient when we could communicate directly. For some reason, Cris has decided not to communicate his latest arguments to me directly, but instead abandoned our debate and put them inside a doc, despite already being engaged in discussion with me. This should already be a sign that his arguments can’t even withstand direct debate. I do not wish to have a doc war, I don’t have the time for this, so Cris, if you still wish to contest this after reading this rebunk, just debate me on Reddit or Discord, your choice, and we can make sure everyone sees the verdict. I’m not making another doc. Now, moving onto rebunking stuff. Cris’ most recent doc is mostly giving context on different arguments that we’ve exchanged (he notably omits how I destroyed his alternative theory of intuitive learning in this doc, and the multiple times in our Reddit debate where he provided studies to try and support his point despite them doing anything but). However, the main point of the debunk goes as such: “Let's just say even with all the unknown micro factors she still has a 99% accuracy per calculation, that's pretty …

The first lines of the plain-text copy. Formatting and images are only in the PDF/DOCX.

Listed in