Validity of LE interpretation (Umineko)

Auovel: Affirming LE interpretation. Me (Apos): Skeptic to LE interpretation. Auovel: Let's establish 3 motives for Battler: 1. Wanting to defeat Erika 2. Resurrection Beatrice's memories (I know you wont grant this yet, but we will investigate this matter soon) 3. Prove he's reached Beatrice's truth. and let's establish a fact, this one is a spoiler in regards to the culprits identity: ||Sayo Yasuda (Shannon) is the culprit, and Shannon also = Kanon, So Beatrice = Shannon = Kanon.|| If you take a look at what you're saying, you're positing that Battler had pitied her and fell for her traps, which is true, I agree that this occurred, but with Battler intentionally falling for it: When you take a look at Battler and his previous interactions with Erika (Episode 5), she has made it clear that she's hostile and an enemy towards Battler. Towards the end of Episode 5, Battler infers the truth about Beatrice, and he now knows who the culprit is, they try to trap him into revealing who the culprit is, but he then presents himself as the culprit inside this theory, to try and not reveal who the culprit is (Shannon and Kanon), if Battler this second did reveal who the culprit is, then they would've been able to genuinely destroy Beatrice forever. and I'm here expressing Erika's intentions, she wouldn't mind just stepping over Battler and doing that to Beatrice. So if you look at Episode 6 where he pitied her, it was done in a strategic manner, when you look at these 2 …